本文通过对天府广场出土两块东汉碑文的考释,认为系记载裴君和李君两位地方官员的德政碑。作者联系文献记载对其中的疑难词句一一进行考释,认为裴君并非《裴岑纪功碑》中的裴岑,其“平乱”对象可能是鲜卑;长期以来学术界大多认为墨学在战国末或汉初便已消亡,但李君碑中的“诱进儒墨”之语表明,墨学在东汉末期还存在,其学术地位还不低,并未被边缘化。 This article examines and explains two pieces of Eastern Han inscriptions unearthed in Tianfu Square, which are regarded as the moral monument of two local officials of Pei Jun and Li Jun. The author makes reference to the historical records of the difficult words and sentences in his account and finds that Pei-jun was not the Pei Cen in “Pei Ceni Gongbei” and that his object of “disorganization” may be Xianbei. For a long time, most scholars in the academic circles think that in the Warring States The end of the Han Dynasty or the early Han Dynasty had already died out, but the words “inducing Confucianism and Mohism” in Li Junbei indicated that Mohism still exists in the late Eastern Han Dynasty. Its academic status is not low and has not been marginalized.