法律条文一般是多重复合判断。常见的多重复合判断形式,有假言判断的前件或后件是联言判断或选言判断的形式,也有选言(或联言)判断的肢判断是联言(或选言)判断或假言判断的形式,其逻辑结构比较复杂。分析多重复合判断,首先要找出其主要层次,再逐层分析肢判断间的关系。通过分析,写出其结构式再对结构式进行分解或变形处理,就可以把多重复合判断所包涵的思想内容充分揭示出来。这对于我们理解、应用法律条文,是很有帮助的。本文特对法律条文中较为常见的几种结构形式,分别作如下分析。 一,前件是选言判断的复合判断 例如《中华人民共和国刑法》第五十三条, The legal provisions are generally multiple composite judgment. The common form of multiple compound judgment, the antecedent or the consequent with the hypothesis of judgment, is the form of conjunctive or electoral judgments, and the judgments of the electoral (or conjunctive) judgments are the judgments of conjunctions (or electoral) or The form of hypothesis judgment, its logical structure is more complicated. Analysis of multiple composite judgments, we must first find out its main level, and then layer by layer analysis of the relationship between limb judgment. By analyzing and writing out the structural formulas and then decomposing or transforming the structural formulas, the ideological content contained in the multiple compound judgment can be fully revealed. This is very helpful for us to understand and apply the legal provisions. This article specializes in the legal provisions of the more common several forms of structure, respectively, as follows. First, the antecedent is the judgment of the electoral compound judgment For example, “the People’s Republic of China Criminal Law” 53rd,