论文部分内容阅读
反倾销、反补贴和保障措施是当今国际贸易中最基本的贸易救济措施,俗称“两反一保”。产业损害认定是实施贸易救济措施必须满足的共同实质要件,而反倾销、反补贴和保障措施的不同性质造成它们在产业损害认定方面的诸多差异。本文主要结合WTO争端解决机构对相关争议点的解释,就反倾销、反补贴和保障措施在“国内产业”、“损害”和“因果关系”认定方面表现出的相似点和差别点,逐一进行比较和分析,以期使产业损害认定在法律和实践中的模糊之处得以明晰。
Anti-dumping, countervailing and safeguard measures are the most basic trade remedies in today’s international trade, commonly known as “two anti-one insurance”. The identification of industrial damage is a common essential requirement that trade remedy measures must meet, and the different nature of anti-dumping, countervailing and safeguard measures have caused many differences in the identification of industrial damage. In this paper, we mainly explain the similarities and differences between anti-dumping, countervailing and safeguard measures in the recognition of “domestic industries”, “damages” and “causations” based on the interpretation of relevant disputes by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body Differences, one by one for comparison and analysis, in order to make the identification of industrial damage in the law and practice of the ambiguities can be clear.