论文部分内容阅读
奥特曼自问在波谲云诡的游戏圈混迹多年,对有如天马行空才华横溢出乎意料收发由心的圈内创意已有不错的免疫力,但前两天还是被一则消息雷到了:某前著名游戏公司邀请现著名美女兽兽同学做其新三国作品的代言人!此消息之真实性奥特曼不做辨别,自从失去某著名游戏的代理权,美女CEO也要离职之后,该公司做出任何惊人之举都是可以接受的,但用明显是负面人物(兽兽同学人品如何奥特曼不知,但其名气非正面意义却是不争的事实)做自己产品的代言人,确实值得商榷。代言人是用其正面形象指代所代言产品某种或整体的形象的,难道启用负面形象代言人为的就是给自己的游戏加上负面光环?这种逆向思维,反向操作真真是令人叹服。貌似以放荡不羁,无所不用著称的影视娱乐行业在X照门之后还是放弃了事件中的若干参与者做代言人或主角,看来游戏行业在代言方面已经走在了娱乐行业前面。
Altman asked ourselves for a long time in the paradox of the game, and for many years there was a good immunity to the creativity and creativity that transcend the heart of the world. However, a message came two days ago: Well-known game companies are invited to the famous beauty beast animal classics to do the work of his new Three Kingdoms spokesman! The authenticity of this message Altman does not distinguish, since losing the proxy rights of a famous game, beauty CEO also have to leave after the company made any Amazing move is acceptable, but obviously the negative character (how animal character of animal beast do not know, but the fame of non-positive fact is an indisputable fact) to do their own spokesman for the product, is indeed debatable. Spokesman uses his positive image to refer to a certain or overall image of his endorsement product. Is it possible to add a negative aura to his own game by enabling negative image endorsement? Looks like the bohemian, omnipotent film and television entertainment industry in the X according to the door or give up the number of participants in the event as a spokesman or protagonist, it seems the game industry in the endorsement has gone in front of the entertainment industry.