读大学时读到柳宗元,当然也就读到《封建论》。首先解题,这是例行的,可这次老师的“解题”挺费劲儿:这里的“封建”之义,不是我们通常所称的从秦始皇统一开始到辛亥革命推翻的“封建社会”的“封建”,而是中国历史上传统的“封建”,指的是秦之前周王朝所立“封土建国”的制度,秦始皇统一就废了封建改行郡县。于是好一番训曰:“‘封’者,……也”、“‘建’者,……也”云云。本义、引申义……全明白了,就只剩下一个“疑义”让人犯糊涂:既然此“封建”非彼“封建”也, Liu Zongyuan read college, of course, also read “feudal theory.” First of all, this is a routine problem, but this time the teacher’s “problem solving” is very laborious: Here’s “feudal” righteousness is not what we commonly refer to as the “feudal society” from the beginning of the Qin Shihuang reunification to the overthrow of the 1911 Revolution. But rather the traditional “feudal” in Chinese history, referring to the system of “enclave and founding a nation” established by the Zhou Dynasty before the Qin Dynasty. When the Qin Shi Huang reunified, the feudal regime was retired from the county. So a good lesson saying: “’seal’ who, ... also,” “built” who ... ... and so on. The original meaning, extended meaning ... ... all understand, only one “doubt” makes a confused: Since this “feudal” not “feudal” also,