赵亚欣同志的《职工补课之我见》,对“双补”提出了他自己的看法。一些从事职工教育的同志说“双补”的成绩还是主要的,虽然也存在一些不足。把“双补”的得与失搞清楚看来是很有必要的,因为认识上确存在着(甚至是很大的)差异。本期我们转载赵亚欣同志的文章,期望引起大家的关心和讨论。欢迎同志们各抒己见。讨论中自然可以再补充事实,但更希望同志们能再次学习八号文件,从提出“双补”任务的背景、必要性,任务与需要是否一致,任务的提出与实行的关系,成绩的取得及其原因、问题的存在及其原因,从几年的“双补”实践中可以吸取的经验教训等等方面提出自己的看法,前事不忘,后事之师。我们总结“双补”工作是为了从中获取有益的东西,把今后的工作做得更好,本着这个精神,踊跃参加讨论。。讨论过程中,我们将邀请一些专家作专题论述。 Comrade Zhao Yaxin’s “My View on Staff Rectification” put forward his own opinion on “double replenishment.” Some comrades engaged in staff education say the achievement of “double subsidy” is still the main one, although there are some shortcomings. It seems necessary to clarify the gains and losses of “double subsidies” because there is indeed (even a great) difference in understanding. This issue we reprint Comrade Zhao Yaxin’s article, expectations aroused everyone’s concern and discussion. Welcome comrades to express their views. In the course of discussion, we can naturally supplement the facts, but we also hope that comrades can once again study the 8th document. From the background and necessity of presenting the “double-complement” task, whether the task and needs are consistent, the relationship between the task formulation and implementation, and the achievement of achievements And its causes, the existence of the problems and their causes, put forward their own views from the experiences and lessons learned in the practice of “double supplement” in recent years, and so on. We conclude that “double subsidy” work is to obtain useful things from it and to do a better job in the future. In this spirit, we should actively participate in the discussion. . During the discussion, we will invite some experts to make a special discussion.