论文部分内容阅读
量刑规范化是中国刑事审判量刑程序改革的重要问题。根据量刑程序改革试点所获得的材料,运用严格科学的经典实验法,通过综合比对与配对比对测试隔离式量刑程序的实施效果,发现隔离式量刑程序具有可行性。它不仅有助于显著提高量刑过程的透明度,更利于增加法官获取、采纳量刑信息的数量与比率。虽然程序参与主体对隔离式量刑程序的满意程度没有达到预想高度,但一审量刑程序结果的合法性与合理性更优。同时,隔离式量刑程序有助于合议庭功能的实质化,可被视为未来深化庭审改革的重要突破口。但调查结果也发现,实验过程中律师作用的发挥不够理想,需要进一步加以完善。
The standardization of sentencing is an important issue for the reform of the sentencing procedure in China. According to the material obtained from the reform pilot program of sentencing procedure, using the strict and scientific classic experimental method, the results of the implementation of the test isolation sentencing procedure through comprehensive comparison and pairing comparison show that the isolation sentencing procedure is feasible. It not only helps to significantly improve the transparency of the sentencing process, but also helps increase the number and ratio of sentencing information obtained and adopted by judges. Although the participants in the procedure do not reach the expected level of satisfaction with the segregation sentencing procedure, the results of the first-instance trial are more legal and reasonable. At the same time, the segregation of sentencing procedures helps the substantive function of the collegiate bench and can be seen as an important breakthrough in deepening the trial reform in the future. However, the findings also found that the role played by lawyers during the experiment is not ideal and needs to be further improved.