抽空一种制度框架的历史内涵,对制度进行平面化和抽象化处理,很容易导致一个国家的政治实践最终进入概念游戏的死胡同。近日,关于宪政的争论着实让两会过后稍显沉寂的知识界热闹了一阵子。事情的起因是红旗文稿上发表的名为《宪政与人民民主制度之比较研究》的文章,作者中国人民大学法学院杨晓青教授在文中给宪政打上了资本主义的标签,并不无耸人听闻地宣称“以宪政理念为标准,就无共产党的领导地位”。一石激起千层 Evacuating the historical connotation of a system framework and flattening and abstraction of the system can easily lead to a country’s political practice eventually entering the dead end of the concept game. Recently, the controversy over constitutionalism has really broucked the slightly quiet intellectual circles after the two sessions. The cause of the incident is the article entitled “Comparative Study of Constitutionalism and People’s Democracy” published in the Red Flag Manuscript. Professor Yang Xiaoqing of the School of Law of Renmin University of China labeled the constitutional government capitalism without alleging sensationally that “With constitutional philosophy as the standard, there is no Communist leadership.” A stone aroused Melaleuca