只有在法律设定的目的确实是为了保护被害人的前提下,被害人才能以此为理由主张自己成立共犯责任例外;对于法律没有将对合行为规定成犯罪的对合一方,不应因其对合行为而承担共犯责任;如果诱捕行为制造了犯罪,那么诱捕人不能以诱捕为理由主张不应承担共犯责任;正犯被诱捕并不是共犯不承担责任的抗辩事由;在共犯退出的情况下,共犯对于退出后其他共同犯罪人的行为及其结果不再承担责任,但是对于退出前的行为仍然要依据具体情况承担不同的责任。 Only when the purpose of the law is designed to protect the victim is it possible for the victim to advocate for the establishment of an exception to the criminal responsibility for accomplice; and for a party that is not criminalized by the law as a crime, If the traps create a crime, then the trappers can not advocate that they should not assume the responsibility of accomplice; Trapped offenders are not a defense of the accomplice not responsible; In the case of an accomplice’s exit, The behavior of the other co-criminals after the withdrawal and their consequences no longer bear the responsibility, but the behavior before the exit still needs to bear different responsibilities according to the specific conditions.