一、引言1.1本文是委员会关于平行程序的最终报告。在一段概念性的介绍后(报告第一部分),该报告从国内法与国际公法的角度对平行程序做了一个概述(报告第二、第三部分);紧接着从国际商事仲裁的角度对平行程序这一理念进行了分析与探讨(报告第四部分);最后委员会作出了结论与建议(报告第五部分)。A平行程序(未决诉讼)学说的定义1.2詹姆斯福西特在权威性的国际比较法学会1994报告一决定国际私法管辖权部分,对平行程序@的描述如下:相同当事人就同一争议以相同的诉因,同时或先后在两个以上 I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This article is the final report of the Committee on parallel procedures. After a conceptual introduction (part I of the report), the report provides an overview of the parallel proceedings from both domestic and international public law points (parts II and III of the report); followed by a parallel review of international commercial arbitration Procedures for this concept were analyzed and discussed (Part IV of the report); Finally, the Committee made its conclusions and recommendations (Part V of the report). A. Definition of Parallelism (Pending Action) Doctrine 1.2 James Firtht, at the authoritative International Society of Comparative Law 1994 report, which defines the part of the jurisdiction of private international law, describes the parallel procedure as follows: The same parties refer to the same complaint in the same case Because, at the same time or successively in more than two