论文部分内容阅读
在当下如果你问开发商或者市民,一个好的房子先决条件是什么,不出意外他们会连声说:地段,地段,当然还是地段!但是当你问建筑师什么才算好的建筑,估计他会犹豫一下,答案可能不像“地段”那么唯一,但是空间和光影一定是绕不过的,而且也基本不会有人反对。为什么建筑师对建筑的空间和光影效果会如此的痴迷和情有独钟?且不说那穹顶宛若飘浮的圣索非亚大教堂,也不必说至今屹立在雅典卫城光影交织的帕提侬神庙,更不必说那具有八点九米直径圆洞光
In the moment if you ask the developer or the citizen what is a prerequisite for a good house, and without exception they will repeatedly say: lots, lots, and of course lot! But when you ask the architect what is considered a good building, Will hesitate, the answer may not be as “lot ” so unique, but the space and lighting must be around, and basically no one objected. Why architects are obsessed and soft-hearted about the space and lighting effects of architecture? Not to mention that dome is like a floating Hagia Sophia, nor does it have to say that the temple of the Parthenon Not to mention the hole light with a diameter of 8.9mm