我是一名内刊编辑,做好这个工作,必须要挑起两头担子,担子的一头是读者,一头是作者。长期处于挑担者的位置,日子久了容易形成既定思维。那么,编辑们不妨与作者和读者来个换位思考,激发自己的创新思维。编辑收到的优秀而有深度的稿件不足,而作者的大量稿件由于大多未被采用而杳无音讯。两者之间也常常生出误解,编辑觉得作者的稿件质量差,而作者也责怪编辑不重视自己的劳动成果。这样的问题采用换位思考 I am an internal editor, to do this work, we must stir up two shoulders, one of the burden is the reader, one is the author. Long-term position in the picker, the long time easy to form the established thinking. Then, editors may wish to empathy with authors and readers to stimulate their own innovative thinking. The excellent and in-depth manuscripts received by the editors were not enough, and the author’s large number of manuscripts lacked information since most were not used. The misunderstandings often arise between the two, and editors find the authors’ quality of the manuscripts poor, and the author blames editors for not paying attention to their own labor. Such issues using empathy