我国刑法中的着手理论是由大陆法系引进的。随着理论和实践的发展,再加上着手理论本身存在的固有缺陷,原有的着手理论在适用中逐步凸显出它的不足,暴露出一些问题,所以有必要突出重围,完善着手理论或者重新建立新的理论。在这种努力过程中,出现了保留着手理论坚持传统主客观相统一的“保守派”、抛弃着手理论试图进行彻底改革的“改良派”。通过对这些观点的探讨比较其优劣,寻求值得借鉴的理论来替代原有的着手理论。 The theory of proceeding in our criminal law was introduced by the civil law system. With the development of theory and practice, coupled with the inherent defects in the theory itself, the original theory of starting to gradually highlight its inadequacies in the application, exposing some problems, it is necessary to highlight the siege, improve the theory or re-start Create a new theory. In this process of endeavor, there emerged the “conservative” that kept its theory and adhered to the traditional unification of subjectivity and objectivity and abandoned the “reformists” who tried to conduct radical reforms. By comparing these advantages and disadvantages, we can seek the theory which is worth learning to replace the original theory.