论文部分内容阅读
简易程序是相对于普通程序更为简便的审理程序,学者们也往往从提高诉讼效率、节约司法成本来说明其适用的必要性与合理性。2012年3月通过并于2013年1月1日正式实施的新《刑事诉讼法》更继承了1996年的简易审判程序,并在此基础上加以改进。此次新法从简易程序的适用范围、适用条件、审判组织、审限、庭审模式、以及包括文书的简便制作等都作出了详细的规定。从而为司法实务工作者提供了更好的蓝本。但同时面对新法,司法工作者也面临着各种挑战。本文以西宁市区某基层检察院和法院为调研对象,通过实际的调查和研究来探讨新《刑事诉讼法》背景下关于简易程序适用的相关问题。
The summary procedure is a simple and convenient trial procedure compared with the ordinary procedure. Scholars often explain the necessity and rationality of the procedure from the aspects of improving the efficiency of litigation and saving the judicial cost. The new Code of Criminal Procedure, passed in March 2012 and formally implemented on January 1, 2013, inherited the summary trial of 1996 more and improved on that basis. The new law made detailed provisions on the scope of application, conditions of application, trial organization, judicial review, courtroom mode, and the simple production of documents, including the summary procedure. Thus providing a better blueprint for judicial practitioners. At the same time, however, judicial workers face various challenges in the face of the new law. This article takes a grass-roots procuratorate and a court in Xining city as the research object, through actual investigation and research to explore the relevant issues about the application of summary procedure in the context of the new “Criminal Procedure Law.”