论文部分内容阅读
法经济学认为,法律的生成和运行均存在一定成本,如果一种法律体制所带来的收益远高于它的成本,那么它就是有效率的。因此判断反垄断的何种执行体制更具效率,就要对该种执行体制的成本与收益进行比较。公共执行和私人执行作为反垄断执行体制的两大支柱,各有其弊端和优势,通过对二者的效率性分析,可获得反垄断法执行体制的优化设置,进而获得更为有效的资源配置。
According to law and economics, there is a certain cost for the formation and operation of the law. If a legal system benefits much more than its cost, then it is efficient. Therefore, to determine what kind of enforcement system is more efficient antitrust, it is necessary to compare the costs and benefits of the implementation system. As the two pillars of the antitrust enforcement system, public enforcement and private enforcement each have their own drawbacks and advantages. By analyzing the efficiency of the two, it is possible to obtain the optimal setup of the antitrust enforcement system so as to obtain a more effective allocation of resources .