论文部分内容阅读
骗取出境证件罪的既未遂问题在学术界及实践中一直存在很大争议。本文从实践中的案例出发,分析现存的分歧点,后以结果犯和行为犯的区分标准及本罪所保护的法益的角度来认定骗取出境证件罪系结果犯。最后通过对现存不同观点的分别论证说理来确定将出境证件骗到手系本罪的既遂标准,而且在认定“情节严重”时不以既遂为必要。
Attempts to defraud crimes of deportation have always been controversial in academia and practice. Starting from the practical case, this article analyzes the existing differences and then finds the result of the crime of cheating outbound documents in the light of the distinguishing criteria of result guilty and behavior guilty and the legal interests protected by this crime. In the end, it is necessary to determine whether the outbound certificate is the accomplished standard for the crime of handing out the offenses by separately arguing the existing different points of view, and not necessary if the case of “serious circumstances” is found.