论文部分内容阅读
按照刑法三机能说,刑法的机能可以概括为三个方面,一是行为规制方面,强调确定犯罪、惩罚犯罪;二是法益保护机能,强调保卫社会、维护稳定;三是人权保障机能,强调规制司法、保障人权。刑法的人权保障机能和保护机能存在一定的矛盾,从《刑法修正案》(九)关于恐怖犯罪的相关规定可以看出这种矛盾,尤其是现代风险社会对保护机能的强调,也出现了传统刑法观和安全刑法观两种理念的对立。两大机能的矛盾并非不可调和,需要寻找到一个平衡点,目前中国刑法应该稍微偏向人权保障机能。
According to the three functions of criminal law, the function of criminal law can be summed up in three aspects. One is behavior regulation, emphasizing the definition of crime and punishing crime. The second is the legal protection function, emphasizing the protection of society and maintaining stability. The third is human rights protection function, emphasizing regulation Justice, protection of human rights. There are some contradictions between the human rights protection function and the protection function of the criminal law. From the “Criminal Law Amendment” (9) on the relevant provisions of the crime of terrorism can be seen that this contradiction, in particular, the modern risk society to protect the function of the emphasis also appeared in the traditional Opposition Between Two Concepts of Criminal Law and Security Criminal Law. The contradiction between the two major functions is not irreconcilable, we need to find a balance point. At present, China’s criminal law should be slightly biased in favor of human rights protection.