论文部分内容阅读
传统史学通过衡评既往树立一面镜子规范社会。而镜子的“保真度”取决于其衡评模式及衡评标准,其衡评标准依史家不同的是非观有“异端”史学、“正统”史学和御用史学三种情况。这三种标准对镜子的“保真度”影响至为重大。
Traditional historiography establishes a mirror to regulate the society through the evaluation of the past. The “fidelity” of the mirror depends on its evaluation mode and its evaluation criteria. The evaluation criteria vary according to the different historians. They are “heresy”, “orthodox”, “historiography” and “imperial history” Happening. These three criteria have a significant impact on the “fidelity” of the mirror.