论文部分内容阅读
在《宪法》、《刑事诉讼法》等法律分别增加了“人权保障”的内容之后,作为保障法的刑法是否因此需要重新加以审视、研究,这引起了广泛的争议。结合现行《刑法》的规定,尤其是《刑法》第1条对于“立法目的”的规定,明显存在不合时宜的地方。在其他法律纷纷将人权保障作为目的抑或任务之后,作为保障法的刑法是否应结合最新的理论和实际,是一个需要认真加以研究的问题。刑法的目的应当是法益的恢复,其中也包括人权的保障。其他的一些制度,如死刑、刑法宪法化等制度方面,也都需要进行一些调整,以进一步满足人权保障的需要。
After the Constitution, the Criminal Procedure Law and other laws have added “human rights protection” respectively, whether the criminal law as the safeguard law needs to be reviewed and studied again has caused widespread controversy. In combination with the provisions of the existing “Criminal Law”, especially the provisions of Article 1 of the Criminal Law for the purpose of “legislative purpose ”, there is obviously an outdated place. After other laws have taken human rights protection as an objective or task, whether the criminal law as safeguard law should incorporate the latest theory and practice is a problem that needs to be seriously studied. The purpose of criminal law should be the recovery of legal interests, including human rights protection. Some other systems, such as the death penalty and the constitutionalization of criminal law, also need some adjustments to further meet the needs of human rights protection.