论文部分内容阅读
在美国,以UCR和NCVS为代表的两种犯罪统计模式运用不同的统计方法,为学者、政府警务部门执法提供了较为科学可靠的社会犯罪数据情况。我国刑事政策研究偏重定性分析而忽视定量研究。结合中国的现实情况,对刑事政策研究、犯罪统计的制定和选取,应当注意:官方的警务犯罪统计亟待完善;将犯罪被害的调查,作为对于警务犯罪案件统计的补充,降低犯罪黑数对于犯罪统计的影响;刑事政策的研究者在具体研究刑事政策时要勤于做社会研究,收集第一手资料。
In the United States, the two crime statistics models represented by UCR and NCVS use different statistical methods to provide more scientific and reliable social crime data for law enforcement of scholars and government police departments. The research on criminal policy in our country lays emphasis on the qualitative analysis and neglects the quantitative research. Combined with the reality of China, we should pay attention to the formulation and selection of criminal statistics and crime statistics: the statistics of official police crimes need to be perfected; the investigation of the criminal victims should be used as a supplement to the statistics of police criminal cases to reduce the crime black numbers The impact of criminal statistics; criminal policy researchers in the specific study of criminal policy should diligently do social research, collect first-hand information.