论文部分内容阅读
西方现代阐释学的“视界融合”理论,肯定了接受者对文本视界再创造的权力。这为我们考察今文家对《春秋》的阐释提供了一种可资借鉴的理论方法。“《春秋》无达辞”虽出自董氏,客观上却是《公》《》解经与董氏释经共有的逻辑前提。这一逻辑前提不仅为今文家释经提供广阔的阐释空间,同时也道出《春秋》的可阐释性和阐释的无限性的特点。《公羊传》、《梁传》对《春秋》“微言大义”、“褒贬书法”的训释,是《春秋》视界与今文家视界相互融合的表现;其“咬文嚼字”的功夫也有益于汉语训诂学、修辞学的建立和发展。
Western modern hermeneutics “horizon fusion ” theory, affirmed the receiver’s power to recreate the text horizon. This provides a reference for us to examine the writer’s interpretation of “Spring and Autumn”. “Spring and Autumn” No Resignation “although from Dong, objectively it is the logical premise of” public “” Xie “interpretation of the Scriptures and Dong’s interpretation. This logical premise not only provides a vast room for interpretation of the present writer, but also expounds the infinitely interpretable nature of ”Spring and Autumn“ and its interpretation. The explanation of ”Spring and Autumn“, ”Microblogging“ and ”complimenting calligraphy“ in ”The Legend of the Rams“ and ”The Legend of the Gansu“ are the manifestations of the integration of the ”Spring and Autumn“ vision and the present writer’s vision; ”Kung Fu is also conducive to the establishment and development of Chinese Exegesis, Rhetoric.