论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨婚姻关系中严重殴打虐待配偶者的人格特点,为预防家庭暴力提供参考依据。方法对陕西省咸阳市抽取的185个家庭使用一般资料调查表、冲突策略量表、人格诊断问卷进行调查和统计分析。结果施暴组人格诊断总分为(34.24±16.13)分,高于对照组的(27.05±19.56)分;施暴组的分裂样、分裂型、反社会、边缘型、依赖型得分分别为(1.75±1.43)、(2.58±1.61)、(3.28±4.17)、(3.33±1.81)、(3.52±2.10)分,对照组分别为(1.17±1.08)、(1.89±1.66)、(1.93±3.35)、(2.53±2.06)、(2.52±2.20)分,施暴组均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);施暴组反社会人格维度达到划界分数的人数为15人(16.13%),高于对照组的5人(5.43%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.49,P<0.05)。结论严重殴打虐待配偶者的心理健康状况较差,具有一定人格个性基础。
Objective To explore the personality traits of severely beaten abused spouses in marital relations and provide reference for preventing domestic violence. Methods 185 families from Xianyang City, Shaanxi Province were surveyed and statistically analyzed using general information questionnaire, conflict strategy scale and personality diagnosis questionnaire. Results The total score of personality diagnosis in the violent group was (34.24 ± 16.13) points higher than that in the control group (27.05 ± 19.56). The scores of schizoid, schizoid, antisocial, peripheral and dependent groups in the abusive group were (1.75 ± 1.43 ± 1.61, 3.28 ± 4.17, 3.33 ± 1.81 and 3.52 ± 2.10, respectively, while the control group were 1.17 ± 1.08, 1.89 ± 1.66, 1.93 ± 3.35, (2.53 ± 2.06) and (2.52 ± 2.20) points respectively, and the levels in the abusive group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P <0.05). The number of anti-social personality dimensions reached 15 16.13%) and 5 (5.43%) higher than the control group (χ2 = 5.49, P <0.05). Conclusion Severely beaten abusive spouses have poor mental health status and have personality and personality basis.