辨析概念型议论文是指从诠释、分析概念入手或以诠释、分析概念为主要方法来证明论点的议论文.中学生在写作时经常碰到这类题型,但往往写得不甚得法.我们曾以《信心、自信、他信》为题,让学生写作议论文,写前不作任何提示.40篇习作,出于习惯定势,16篇用的是铺陈切题法,开头用了较多篇幅铺叙“信心”或“自信”的重要意义,然后才转入与“他信”的比较分析,入题缓慢而呆板.全部习作中,揭示这三个概念内涵的仅118例,对这三个概念进行比较辨析的仅81例.释义不当、分类不妥、排列错乱的有18例.有8篇习作跳跃写作步骤,急于求成,于应该诠释的概念不作诠释,概念含糊不清,径直进入论证,致使 Discriminating and analyzing conceptual argumentative thesis is the argumentative argumentation that begins with interpreting and analyzing concepts or interpreting and analyzing concepts as the main method. Middle school students often encounter such questions in writing, but they often do not write well. We Once the topic of “Confidence, Self-confidence, and Thaksin” was used, the students were allowed to write argumentative papers and did not give any hints before writing. Forty papers, out of habits, 16 papers were used to spread the word, and more space was used at the beginning. The significance of “confidence” or “confidence” was shed before it was turned into a comparative analysis with “Thussin”, which was slow and rigid. In all the exercises, only 118 of these three concepts were revealed. For example, there are only 81 cases of comparative analysis of these three concepts. There are 18 cases of improper interpretation, improper classification, and disorderly arrangement. There are 8 pieces of work jumping writing steps, and they are anxious to achieve success. The concept that should be interpreted is not interpreted. Concept Vague, straightforward to enter the argument, resulting in