分析陈述和综合陈述的区分是现代经验论(即逻辑经验主义)哲学立场的理论基础,蒯因在著名的“经验论的两个教条”一文中对分析-综合陈述区分的拒斥,常被看作是对现代经验论主义理论基石的最严重的摧毁。本文对蒯因批判的合理性提出质疑,并通过考量他批判两种陈述区分的真正哲学意图,阐释他的后经验主义哲学的特征。 The distinction between analytic statements and syntheses is the theoretical basis of the modern empiricist (ie, empiricist) philosophical position, and because of the rejection of the distinction between analytic-synthetic statements in the famous “two dogmatic” empiricisms, Often seen as the most serious destruction of the foundations of modern empiricism. This article questions Gao’s criticism of rationality and expounds the characteristics of his post-empiricist philosophy by considering his true philosophical intention of criticizing the two statements.