论文部分内容阅读
依照康德先验哲学方法论的划分,历史目的论可以被区分为建构性与范导性两类。由此黑格尔持有一种建构性的历史目的论,即预设某个客观实在的历史目的并由之出发,依照辩证法的结构纯粹逻辑地建构出现实的历史进程。这种历史目的论必然会走向历史决定论,在其中人的自由行动必然无法被设想。黑格尔式的马克思主义阐释模式将建构性的历史目的论模式带入了马克思的历史理论中,使其也陷入了历史决定论的困境。而以康德范导性的历史目的论来理解马克思的历史目的论,则可以使得马克思避免历史决定论的困难。
According to the division of Kant’s transcendental philosophical methodology, the theory of historical teleology can be divided into two categories: constructivism and enlightenment. Thus Hegel holds a constructive theory of historical teleology, which presupposes and sets out an objective and objective historical objective and constructs a realistic historical process purely logically in accordance with the structure of dialectics. This theory of historical teleology inevitably leads to the historical determinism, in which the freedom of man must inevitably be conceived. The Hegelian Marxist model of interpretation brought the constructive model of historical teleology into Marx’s historical theory and plunged it into the predicament of historical determinism. To understand Marx’s theory of historical teleology based on Kant’s guiding theory of historical teleology can make Marx avoid the difficulties of historical determinism.