试论中美宪法权利

来源 :外国法译评 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:stage7
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
试论中美宪法权利(美)钱德纯中美宪法对公民的权利都有明文规定。但由于双方政体本质、传统的不同,除了共同的地方外,还有许多不同的地方,总的来说是异多同少。本文试就下列几方面对中美宪法作以比较:一中美宪法权利的不同表述美国宪法是18世纪的产物,属于旧式宪... On the constitutional rights of both China and the United States (the United States) Both the constitution of China and the United States of Chancery have expressly stipulated the rights of citizens. However, due to the nature and tradition of the political systems of both sides, there are many different places apart from the common places, which are generally more or less different. This article tries to compare the following two aspects of the Chinese and American constitutions: The Different Representations of the Sino-US Constitutional Rights The United States Constitution is the product of the 18th century and belongs to the old constitution ...
其他文献
目的:阐述讨论鱼雷发射时潜艇舱室空气压力容许限值制定的原则及依据。方法:在加压舱及潜艇舱室内受试者暴露在不同的增压速率下观察中耳鼓膜及听阈的变化。结果:当增压速率范围在2.3~3.0kPa/s及3.8~4.5kPa/s时,受试者正常鼓膜的百分比分别为63%~85%及58%~64%。多数受试者保持正常听力,仅个别有10~20dB的暂时性阈移,所有受试者均未发生鼓膜破裂。结论:根据试验结果,提出了如下