论文部分内容阅读
历经中国出版物案和原材料案之后,关于GATT“一般例外”对加入议定书义务可适用性问题之争,在中国稀土案中达到高潮。WTO的司法裁判者面对涉及加入议定书法律地位与性质的“立法沉默”问题,裁决策略从开始的司法经济转变到直面本源性问题,但解决方法上却最终选择了保守而狭隘的文义解释法。稀土案一方面反映了争执各方以法律解释为工具所展开的规则较量,另一方面则深刻地暴露了WTO体制重大缺陷下立法不明与司法克制、追寻真理与遵循先例的矛盾,以及贸易自由化进程中相生相伴的战略之争、权力较量等真实现状。
After the Chinese publication case and the raw material case, the dispute over the applicability of the GATT “General Exception ” to the obligations of the accession agreement culminated in the rare earth case in China. WTO judicial adjudicators face the issue of “legislative silence” concerning the legal status and nature of the accession protocol. The ruling strategy has shifted from the initial judicial economy to that of direct origin. However, the solution has been to choose a conservative and narrow version Interpretation of law. Rare earth cases on the one hand reflect the parties to the dispute interpretation of the law as a tool to start the contest, on the other hand is a profound exposure of the WTO system under the flaw of unclear legislation and judicial restraint, the pursuit of truth and follow the precedent of contradictions, as well as trade liberalization In the course of the process, there is a real battle between strategic competition and power struggle.