论文部分内容阅读
原文作者罗德·米切尔斯是《电影批评》的主编,他擅长从心理分析学角度谈观影经验。文章突出的特点是不再象传统影评那样用理论去分析一部影片,而是通过对影片的阐释去证明一个理论。其所要证明的是电影的影象客体(对象)的物质存在,实际上是缺席的,即不存在的,人们对电影的理解是包括了自己的想象的。但作者强调这种想象并不是偶发性的、纯心理的,即不是唯心的,而是在电影感觉基础上的。作者对伯格曼的《人》中一些引喻的读解也为我们理解电影喻指提供了可供参考的范例。
The author of the original Rod Michelles is “film criticism” editor, he is good at psychoanalysis from the perspective of film experience. The prominent feature of the article is not to use the theory as a traditional film criticism to analyze a film, but through the interpretation of the film to prove a theory. What they want to prove is that the material existence of the film’s image object (object) is virtually absent, that is, it does not exist. People’s understanding of the film includes its own imagination. But the author emphasizes that this imagination is not sporadic, purely psychological, that is not idealistic, but based on the feeling of the film. The author’s interpretation of some of the metaphors in Bergman’s Man also provides an example for us to understand the movie metaphor.