三种价格形式以谁为主(或为基本形式)一直存在着分歧。有的主张以国家定价为主要形式,认为这样才能体现计划经济为主、市场调节为辅的原则。这种主张显然比较强调计划经济的一面,不太重视发挥市场调节的作用,实际上还没有突破旧的传统的价格模式。有的主张市场调节价为主要形式,认为这种价格形式具备了传递供求信息、反映供求关系、指导资源配置和促进技术进步等功能,能使价格真正发挥经济杠杆的调节作用。这种主张实际是 There is always a disagreement as to who is the main (or the basic form) of the three price forms. Some advocate the pricing of the state as the main form, thinking that this can reflect the planned economy, supplemented by the principle of the market. This claim apparently emphasizes more on the planned economy side and less on the role of market regulation. In fact, it has not broken through the old traditional price model. Some advocate the market adjustment price as the main form, that this price form has the function of transmitting supply and demand information, reflecting the relationship between supply and demand, guiding the allocation of resources and promoting technological progress, so that the price can really play a regulatory role of economic leverage. This idea is actually