论文部分内容阅读
北京市近两年法院裁判文书的调查分析结果显示,非法证据排除在实务中存在若干特点:以前期排除为主、法院审理阶段排除少;庭审中提出排除申请为主,庭前启动较少;启动排除程序的证明标准不必然过高,证据合法性证明的形式多样化,但由于判决书说理不详导致具体情况不宜掌握。为推进非法证据排除的实际运用,需要进一步明确庭审程序的效力、重视多种证据形式的并用、保障律师行使辩护权,以及强化司法裁判文书的说理程度。
The investigation and analysis of court judgment documents in Beijing in the past two years show that there are some characteristics of illegal evidence exclusion in practice: the prior exclusion is mainly dominated by the courts and the exclusion of court cases is less; The standard of proving the procedure of exclusion is not necessarily too high, and the form of the proof of the law of evidence is diversified. However, due to the unclear judgment of the verdict, the specific situation is not proper. To promote the practical application of the exclusion of illegal evidence, it is necessary to further clarify the effectiveness of the trial procedure, emphasize the combination of multiple forms of evidence, safeguard the exercise of lawyers’ rights of defense, and strengthen the rationality of judicial adjudication instruments.