现代著名书法家邓散木先生在《临池偶得》一文中对后汉张芝说的“匆匆不暇草书”一语提出了新的解释。他认为:过去解释成“时间匆促,来不及写草书”是错误的,原因是由于古代文章没有标点,往往把人弄糊涂,应加上一个逗号作“匆匆不暇,草书”。这就是说,时间匆促来不及正正经经地写,只好草草作书。邓先生此新解一出,普遍被书法界接受。笔者初读此文时,亦以为言之在理,颇有新意,后来通读了古代书论,才逐渐对此新解发生怀疑,直至认为邓先生解释错了。 Mr. Deng Sanmu, a famous modern calligrapher, put forward a new explanation to the phrase “hurried cursive scriptures” written by Zhang Han in the poem Lin Chi Ou De. In his opinion, it was wrong to explain in the past that “it was too late to write a cursive script because the ancient articles did not have the punctuation. They often confused people. They should add a comma as a” rush and cursive book. " This means that the time hurried to write too late, had novices to write a book. Mr. Deng this new solution, generally accepted by the calligrapher. When I first read this article, I also thought it was reasonable and quite innovative. Later I read through ancient calligraphy and gradually became suspicious of this new solution until I thought Mr. Deng explained it wrongly.