论文部分内容阅读
从“支配—解放”的话语谱系来看,生态女性主义着重从社会文化层面考察支配的成因,认为自然支配和性别支配的根源在于父权制,主张重构女性与自然的联系,通过消除父权制来达成女性和自然共同解放之目的。与生态女性主义的文化批判论不同,马克思主义是革命的浪漫主义。马克思主义基于社会实践基础建构起自然和女性的现实联系,认为自然支配和性别支配的根源在于私有制,主张通过消灭私有制,进而实现自然和女性的双重解放。
From the discourse pedigree of “dominion-liberation”, ecofeminism emphasizes on the causes of dominance from the perspective of social culture. It argues that the natural domination and the domination of sex dominate the patriarchy, advocate the reconstruction of the connection between women and nature, To achieve the goal of common liberation of women and nature. Different from the cultural critique of ecofeminism, Marxism is the revolutionary romanticism. Based on the social practice, Marxism constructs a realistic connection between nature and women. It holds that natural domination and gender domination lie in private ownership. They advocate the emancipation of nature and women through the elimination of private ownership.