论文部分内容阅读
文章里谈到了苏联理论的优越性:所考虑的因素较多、观察与试验的数据较丰富;能把观察与试验的结果和理论联系起来、纳入整套理论之中;以及它是从等强度出发的,并对路基和路面作了综合的考虑。其次谈到,在使用理论和在深入研究时、对现行理论和方法必然会发现一些矛盾。这是事物发展的自然规律。在深入研究时要客观地分析;要重视试验结果,也要重视使用与观察所反映的情况。尤其要注意地区的特点。最后谈到了发展方向中几个比较重要的问题。较详细地谈到只用形变模量这个指标是不够的,说明了为什么必须分析路面应力和研究路面强度的构成与演变过程。也谈到有关设计方案方面的意见。
The article speaks of the superiority of the Soviet theory: more factors under consideration, more abundant observation and experiment data, the ability to relate observations and experimental results to theories and to the whole set of theories, , And made comprehensive consideration of subgrade and pavement. Second, when it comes to the use of theory and in-depth research, some contradictions are bound to be found in the existing theories and methods. This is the natural law of things. In an in-depth analysis of objective analysis; to pay attention to the test results, but also pay attention to the use and observation of the situation reflected. In particular, pay attention to the characteristics of the area. Lastly, I talked about some of the more important issues in the development direction. It is not enough to talk about the mere modulus of deformation in more detail, explaining why it is necessary to analyze pavement stresses and to study the composition and evolution of pavement strength. Also talked about the design proposals.