论文部分内容阅读
一、论定《宣和画谱》名出金元,需同时具备两个条件:其书名确在金元时代出现;确证徽宗时不会出现该书名。书文两个条件仅备其一,其说自然难立。二、韦文误以重神品、重法度为徽宗全部绘画思想,故而认为与强调“思致”、“诗画同一”的《宣和画谱》无关。殊不知“益兴画学”的两大举措同样是徽宗绘画思想的体现。而其措施一“如进士科,下题(以诗句命题,以能否深切诗意为评判标准)取士”便是其重“诗画同一”的铁证;其措施二选文人画家米芾、汉杰考核画学生艺能,就是重文人“思致”与绘画相通的最好说明。三、与《圣朝名画评》、《图画见闻志》、《益州名画录》相比,《宣和画谱》最具独创性,却反被书文指责为抄袭前三部著作,书文论点诚有令人不堪者。
First, the conclusion “Xuan He Hua Pu” named Jin and Yuan, need to have two conditions at the same time: its title does appear in the era of Jin and Yuan Dynasties; confirmed Huizong does not appear when the title. Book one of the two conditions only one, it is naturally difficult to set up. Second, Wei Wen mistakenly attached importance to the gods and graded the degree as the painting thought of Huizong. Therefore, he considered that it had nothing to do with the “Xuan Hehua” that emphasized “thinking and painting”. As everyone knows “Yixing Painting” two major initiatives is also the embodiment of Huizong painting ideas. The measure of a “such as the Jinshi subjects, the next title (propositions to poetry, poetry as a criterion to judge whether or not to take” is its weight “poetry and painting the same” ironclad evidence; Jie test student art students, is the literati “Thinking” and painting the best description of the same. Third, compared with the “saint famous commentary”, “picture see”, “YiZhuan MingPu” compared to “XuanHe picture book” the most original, but was accused of copying the book for the first three books, The arguments are truly unbearable.