论文部分内容阅读
西方“马克思学”学者诺曼.莱文在2006年出版了专著《可悲的骗局:马克思反对恩格斯》,而《马克思主义与现实》2008年第5期译介的《马克思与黑格尔思想的连续性》一文,不过是这一著作思想的缩影。文中,精通历史学的莱文借鉴了马克思早期的通信内容,采用平直的历史叙事,通过筛选马克思思想理论所涉领域“方法”研究得出“早期马克思实践唯物主义转变的分水岭应定位在1843年写作《黑格尔法哲学批判》时期,在此之前无论在哪一领域马克思都没有走出黑格尔的理论视域,马克思和黑格尔都有着思想上的‘连续性’”结论。笔者认为莱文之所以得出此种结论,原因在于其恰恰忽视了辩证法的实践基础,没有摆脱黑格尔的思辨辩证法的唯心主义路线,进而无法上升到马克思主义哲学革命性辩证法的理论高度。
Norman Levin, a Western scholar of Marxism, published his monograph “Sad Contention: Marx Against Engels” in 2006, while “Marxism and Reality”, 2008, No. 5, “Marx and Hegel The continuity of thought ”is merely a microcosm of the thought of the book. In this article, Levin, who is proficient in history, draws on Marx’s early correspondence and adopts a straightforward historical narration to draw the conclusion that the watershed should be changed in the early Marxist practical materialism through the study of the areas covered by Marx’s theory of thought Positioning in the 1843 writing “Critique of Hegel’s jurisprudence” period, no matter in which field before Marx did not get out of Hegel’s theoretical field of vision, Marx and Hegel have ideological ’continuity’ "in conclusion. The author thinks that Levin draws such a conclusion because it just ignores the practical basis of dialectics and does not get rid of Hegel’s idealist dialectical idealist line and thus can not rise to the theoretical level of revolutionary dialectics of Marxist philosophy.