论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,中国建筑史界对于日本学者伊东忠太的早期学术贡献缺乏系统研究,导致对以梁思成、林徽因为代表的中国营造学社所进行的中国建筑史研究缺乏一个可以参照、比较的学术背景。本文将对日本学者伊东忠太的《中国建筑史》著作进行系统地分析,探讨他提出的若干理论问题,并对其研究的特征进行总结,借此在一定程度上还原当时中国建筑史研究的国际学术背景。在此基础上,与梁思成、林徽因所进行的中国建筑史研究进行比较,试图从历史的视角重新评价他们的早期研究工作在该学科中的创新和突破。
For a long time, the Chinese architectural history community lacked systematic research on the early academic contributions of the Japanese scholar Ito Tadao, leading to the lack of a referenceable and comparative academic background for the study of Chinese architectural history conducted by the Chinese Institute of Construction represented by Liang Sicheng and Lin Huicheng. . This article will systematically analyze the works of the Japanese scholar Ito Ta-ta of “The History of Chinese Architecture”, discuss some of his theoretical issues, and summarize the characteristics of his research, to a certain extent restore the study of Chinese architectural history at that time. International academic background. On this basis, it compares with the study of Chinese architectural history conducted by Liang Sicheng and Lin Huiyin, and tries to re-evaluate their early research work innovation and breakthrough in this discipline from the perspective of history.