论文部分内容阅读
30年来,学者们在对刑事诉讼活动进行经济分析时,视角主要集中在诉讼程序、诉讼制度、诉讼行为和诉讼权利四个方面。其中存在三个主要问题:一是分析方法主要是成本—效益理论和边际理论,忽略了更合理的帕累托最优、卡尔多—希克斯标准、博弈论和贝叶斯定理;二是分析过程没有注意刑事诉讼法对当事人行为理性、自由选择的较大限制和对正当性的高价值诉求;三是没有论证运用经济分析方法的前提。今后运用经济分析方法进行刑事诉讼法学研究应注意两个过程:一是应遵循由理念渗透到模型介绍的过程,二是应遵循从理论研究到立法尝试的过程,并以一种包容的心态来对待这种理论的发展。唯此,它必将促进我国刑事诉讼法学的繁荣。
In the past 30 years, scholars have mainly focused on four aspects: litigation procedure, litigation system, litigation behavior and procedural rights in the economic analysis of criminal litigation activities. There are three main problems: First, the analysis methods are mainly cost-benefit theory and marginal theory, ignoring the more reasonable Pareto optimality, the Karl-Hicks standard, game theory and Bayes theorem; secondly, The analysis process did not pay attention to the greater limitation of the parties’ behavior rationality and freedom of choice in the criminal procedure law and the high value appeal to legitimacy. Third, there is no precondition to justify the use of economic analysis. In the future, we should pay attention to the research of criminal procedure jurisprudence by using economic analysis method. One is to follow the process of infiltration from concept to model introduction. The other is to follow the process from theoretical research to legislative attempt, and with an inclusive mentality Treat the development of this theory. Only this, it will promote the prosperity of China’s criminal procedure law.