论文部分内容阅读
一、问题的提出2009年4月,中国海升果汁控股有限公司(以下简称“海升”)在陕西省西安市中级人民法院(以下简称“西安中院”)起诉摩根士丹利国际投资公司(以下简称“大摩国际”)的外汇掉期合约侵犯了自身合法权益。这是2008年下半年以来曝出的中国企业衍生交易重大损失事件中,第1例由中国企业主动诉诸法院的案件。然而,由于双方的衍生品合约中约定了英格兰法院的专属管辖权以及英国法作为准据法,大摩国际随后在英格兰高等法院提起诉讼,要求海升承担外汇
First, the issue raised In April 2009, China Haisheng Juice Holdings Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Haisheng”) in Xi’an City, Shaanxi Province Intermediate People’s Court (hereinafter referred to as “Xi’an Intermediate Court”) sued Morgan Stanley Foreign exchange swap contracts of International Investment Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Great Morgan International”) infringe upon their own legitimate rights and interests. This is the first case of a major loss brought by a Chinese enterprise derivative transaction since the second half of 2008, when a Chinese company voluntarily appealed to the court. However, Morgan Stanley filed a lawsuit in the High Court of England after the contractual rights of the English courts and English law were passed in the derivatives contracts of both parties, requiring them to assume the foreign exchange