论文部分内容阅读
因应着解释学从方法论范式向本体论范式的转向,国内外法学界许多人将哲学诠释学的基本概念和原理运用至法律领域。然而,哲学诠释学的前理解、效果历史、诠释学循环、事物的本质、视阈融合、对话、解释的普遍主义、读者中心论、反对方法等理论资源本身就存在着诸多问题,并不符合法律解释的教义学特性。因此,当前方兴未艾的法解释学应批判性地继受哲学诠释学。
Due to the hermeneutic shift from a methodological paradigm to an ontological paradigm, many people in the legal field at home and abroad apply the basic concepts and principles of philosophical hermeneutics to the legal field. However, there are many problems in the theoretical resources such as pre-understanding of philosophical hermeneutics, the history of hermeneutics, hermeneutics, the nature of things, the fusion of perspectives, the universality of dialogue and interpretation, the reader-centered theory and the opposition method, The Doctrine of Legal Interpretation. Therefore, the current emerging law of hermeneutics should critically inherit philosophical hermeneutics.