论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨两种雾化吸入方式治疗婴幼儿哮喘的临床疗效。方法选取2014年5月至2015年5月我院收治的88例婴幼儿哮喘患儿为研究对象,根据随机数字分组法将患儿均分为观察组和对照组,每组44例。观察组经北京吉纳快乐小猪空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗。对照组经雾化罐雾化给药。观察两组患儿临床疗效。结果观察组患儿治疗总有效率(97.73%)显著高于对照组(79.55%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患儿均未出现严重不良反应。结论经快乐小猪空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗婴幼儿哮喘疗效显著,可有效改善患儿喘息症状,值得临床推广。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of two kinds of atomization inhalation on infant asthma. Methods From May 2014 to May 2015, 88 infants and young children with asthma admitted to our hospital were selected as subjects. According to random number grouping, all children were divided into observation group and control group, with 44 cases in each group. Observation group by Beijing Jina happy pig air compression pump inhalation therapy. The control group was atomized by atomization tank. To observe the clinical efficacy of two groups of children. Results The total effective rate (97.73%) in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group (79.55%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Two groups of children did not appear serious adverse reactions. Conclusion Happy piggy air compression pump atomized inhalation treatment of infantile asthma significant effect, can effectively improve children with wheezing symptoms, worthy of clinical promotion.