论文部分内容阅读
【目的】研究学术研究成果同行评议不同模式,探讨在开放获取发展过程中如何促进研究者之间的交流和学术成果的快速传播。【方法】对国外同行评议的几种模式进行分析研究,介绍了这些同行评议模式的特点、流程、管理方法等,并对基于网络的开放的同行评议模式存在的问题进行了归纳和总结。【结果】开放的同行评议模式加强作者和评议者之间的交流和沟通,推进学术研究成果的快速出版。【结论】随着开放获取的出现和发展,开放的同行评议模式将成为学术研究成果评议方法的一种补充。
【Objective】 To study the different modes of peer review of academic research achievements and to explore how to promote the exchange among researchers and the rapid dissemination of academic achievements in the process of open access and development. 【Method】 Several modes of peer review in foreign countries were analyzed and studied. The characteristics, processes and management methods of these peer review models were introduced. The problems of peer-review mode based on network were summarized and summarized. 【Results】 The open peer review mode enhances the communication and communication between authors and reviewers and promotes the rapid publication of academic research results. 【Conclusion】 With the emergence and development of open access, the open peer review model will be a complement to the academic research results evaluation method.