论文部分内容阅读
民事诉讼中的诉权导入刑事诉讼,产生了刑事诉权的研究理论。但在刑事诉讼中,被害人并不能因为权益受到犯罪行为侵害而当然地拥有刑事诉权。对刑事诉权的把握要以民事诉权的核心内涵为校验标准。在现有的刑事诉权研究理论中,一般只有一元化的权利人观察角度,即只有对诉权应然性的论证,缺少对诉权识别标准、诉权实然性的讨论,这容易导致诉权研究陷入空洞化。通过借鉴民事诉权理论中的诉权要件制度,从实然性角度,可以对被害人刑事诉权及当事人地位进行比较细化的解析。但同时也要看到,导入民事诉讼中的诉权理论,只能解决“何以为诉”的问题,对刑事诉讼中被害人权益的保护可以做刑事诉权“切口”以外的更多努力。
The litigation right in civil procedure is introduced into criminal procedure, resulting in the research theory of criminal procedure. However, in criminal proceedings, the victim can not, of course, have a criminal prosecution because the rights and interests are infringed upon by criminal activities. To grasp the criminal prosecution should take the core content of civil prosecution as the verification standard. In the existing theory of criminal prosecution research, there is usually only a unified viewpoint of the obligee, that is, only the argumentation of the proper accusation of the suiting right and the lack of discussion on the standard of the suiting right and the substantivity of the suiting right, which easily leads to the emptying of the right suiting research . By referring to the system of elements of the right of appeal in the theory of civil suits, from the perspective of reality, we can make a comparatively detailed analysis of the victim’s criminal suits and the status of parties. At the same time, we should also see that the introduction of the theory of right of action in civil litigation can only solve the problem of “what is the right to complain,” and can do more than the criminal right to protect the rights and interests of victims in criminal litigation. .