民法理论通常把多数人债务划分按份债务和连带债务,划分的依据是各债务人是否均负有向债权人偿还全部债务的义务。在司法实践中常常会出现诸多不属于按份债务,与连带债务极为相似,深究却又有不同。本文着重分析了不连带债务的内涵,并同连带债务进行比较,以期对不真正连带债务的范畴进行界定。 The theory of civil law usually divides the debts of the majority into several debts and joint debts according to whether the debtors each have an obligation to repay the entire debts to the creditors. In judicial practice, there are often many do not belong to the debt in accordance with the joint and several liabilities are very similar to the study but there are differences. This article focuses on the analysis of the connotation of non-joint liabilities, and compared with the joint and several debts, in order to define the scope of the real joint and several debts.