论文部分内容阅读
法院判处的财产刑的案件,大多是对犯罪分子并处罚金或没收财产,极少单处罚金或没收财产。就基层人民法院而言,涉及的财产刑主要是罚金。但司法实践中,财产刑的执行效率过低,严重损害了法院判决的严肃性,亵渎了罪刑相适应原则,削弱了财产刑的惩罚与教育犯罪的刑罚功能。对此,本文认为应采取切实措施,保障财产刑的执行,维护法律的权威。
The court sentenced property crimes, most of them fined or confiscated property for criminals, with very few single fine or confiscation of property. As far as grassroots people’s courts are concerned, the property penalty involved is mainly a fine. However, in the judicial practice, the execution efficiency of property punishment is too low, which seriously damages the seriousness of court judgment, blames the principle of crime and punishment, and weakens the penalty function of property punishment and education crime. In this regard, this article believes that practical measures should be taken to ensure the enforcement of property punishment and to maintain the authority of law.