论文部分内容阅读
在不断发展的当今社会,违约精神损害是客观存在的。现有的竞合理论在保护当事人合法利益上存在着比较明显的缺陷。主张赔偿的一方当事人在侵权之诉和违约之诉中取其一,不能同时提起侵权之诉和违约之诉。因此,我们可以学习大陆法系国家的做法,以扩张解释的方法找寻解决此类问题的法律依据。同时,以英美法系将合同类型化区分,制定使用范围和限制。而最终目的是,实现我国违约赔偿制度化,使得违约精神损害赔偿在我国的民法体系中找到可以适用的法律。
In today’s evolving society, default damage is an objective reality. The existing competing theory has obvious defects in protecting the legitimate interests of the parties concerned. One of the parties who advocates compensation should take one of the complaints of infringement and the one of breach of contract, and can not simultaneously bring the lawsuit of infringement and the breach of contract. Therefore, we can learn from the practices of civil law countries and expand the method of interpretation to find the legal basis for solving such problems. At the same time, the contract type of the Anglo-American legal system to distinguish between the development of the use of the scope and restrictions. The ultimate aim is to institutionalize the breach of contract compensation in our country and to make compensation for the spirit of breach of contract to find applicable laws in the civil law system of our country.