论文部分内容阅读
艾南英是晚明文学复古思潮中的重要人物,虽然他在文学主张和文学创作实践上都以复兴古文、反对骈文为主要特征,但是,在具体的方向和道路上却与唐、宋以来的古文前辈有所不同,与同时代的复古派也有明显的差别。他一方面倡导取径唐宋、上溯秦汉的师古道路,即先以韩愈、欧阳修、苏轼、曾巩等唐宋古文家之文为津筏,然后再由此上溯到秦、汉散体古文,反对前后“七子”直接取法秦、汉古文的主张,又对取法六朝骈文的倾向和路径予以否定和批判。另一方面,他还从体制上对骈文和散体古文进行辨析,大力推尊古文,极力批判、否定骈文,在骈文批评方面既有贡献,又带有明显的偏见。
Although Ai Nanying was an important figure in the retro thinking of late Ming literature, although he mainly rejuvenated the ancient essay and opposed obama in the practice of literature and literary creation, Ai Nanying was different from the Tang and Song dynasties Of the ancient prose predecessors are different, and the same period of the retro school there are significant differences. On the one hand, he advocated taking the path of turning the Tang and Song dynasties back to Qin and Han dynasties, that is, using the texts of the ancient Han writers such as Han Yu, Ouyang Xiu, Su Shi and Zeng Gong as the rafts, and then from the ancient prose of the Qin and Han dynasties , And opposed “before and after” the “seven sons” to directly take the ideas of Qin and Han Chinese. They also denied and criticized the tendencies and paths of the prose prose in the Six Dynasties. On the other hand, he also systematically analyzed the prose and the scattered ancient prose, vigorously pushed forward the ancient prose, tried his utmost to criticize and negate the prose, and made both contributions and obvious prejudices in prose criticism.