论文部分内容阅读
一直以来,很多学者都在探索辩诉交易制度的科学性和合理性,尤其从诉讼成本和诉讼效益,利益需求和有限理性角度进行剖析,所得出辩诉交易制度相当实用的观点,使得一些学者呼吁在我国尝试适用辩诉交易制度去处理一些刑事案件,但是,毕竟引入并内化一个并非本土发展起来的制度,是需要相当谨慎和理性的,而不是觉得某项制度在国外运行特别好,就认为在我国是理所当然。是需要考虑我国现有一些制度或规定与之的协调性。因此,文章将从辩诉交易制度与我国刑事诉讼基本原则的冲突方面进行分析,进而客观认识辩诉交易制度本身以及我国刑事诉讼基本原则的内涵,并对辩诉交易制度能否引入并适用于我国作出相关分析。
All along, many scholars have been exploring the scientific and reasonable plea bargaining system, especially from litigation costs and litigation benefits, interest needs and bounded rationality analysis point of view, the resulting plea bargaining system quite practical point of view, some scholars called for My country has tried to apply the system of plea bargaining to handle a number of criminal cases. However, after all, the introduction and internalization of a system that is not developed domestically requires considerable caution and rationality rather than a particular system that operates exceptionally well abroad, My country is granted. It is necessary to consider the existing harmonization of some existing systems and regulations in our country. Therefore, the article will analyze the conflict between the system of plea bargaining and the basic principles of criminal procedure in our country, and then objectively understand the system of plea bargaining and the connotation of the basic principle of criminal procedure in our country, and make a conclusion on whether the system of plea bargaining can be introduced and applied in our country analysis.