论文部分内容阅读
经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影具有创伤小、局部血管并发症少、无须中断肝素治疗及术后无体位限制等优点,已成为目前冠状动脉造影及冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的血管入路。但经桡动脉冠状动脉造影失败率高达11%,因此,急需探索新的方法提高手术成功率,同时又具有经桡动脉冠状动脉造影的优势。文献报道经尺动脉行冠状动脉造影是可行的,同时保持经桡动脉造影的优点。为了解经尺动脉冠状动脉造影与经桡动脉造影的优劣,我们将69例拟行冠状动脉造影及PCI的患者随机分为两组进行了对比研究。
Transradial coronary angiography with less trauma, less local vascular complications, without interruption of heparin therapy and postoperative no body position restrictions, has become the current coronary angiography and coronary intervention (PCI) of the vascular access. However, the failure rate of transradial coronary angiography is as high as 11%. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore new methods to improve the success rate of surgery, and at the same time, it has the advantages of transradial coronary angiography. It has been reported in the literature that coronary artery angiography via the ulnar artery is feasible, while maintaining the advantages of transradial arteriography. In order to understand the pros and cons of transsphenoidal coronary angiography and transradial arteriography, 69 patients scheduled for coronary angiography and PCI were randomly divided into two groups for comparative study.