论文部分内容阅读
我国法律对于环境污染侵权责任的规定主要见于《民法通则》、《侵权责任法》、《环境保护法》及其他单行环境保护法律,现有规定中仍然存在一些需要细化完善之处。本文建议以最高人民法院司法解释的形式,对环境污染侵权责任的两个问题进行完善:第一是解释《侵权责任法》第65条“污染环境”的概念,扩大该条的适用范围,使得光污染等新型污染亦能依该条得到救济;第二是解构环境污染行为,建议将环境污染行为分解为污染者排放污染物与污染物致害这两个阶段,将之视为一个持续性侵权行为,从而重新选择环境污染责任诉讼时效的起算点。
The provisions of our law on liability for environmental pollution infringement are mainly found in the General Principles of Civil Law, the Tort Liability Act, the Environmental Protection Law and other laws governing the protection of the environment. However, there are still some areas where the existing provisions need to be refined and perfected. This article suggests that the Supreme People's Court judicial interpretation of the two issues of environmental pollution infringement responsibility to improve: the first is to explain the “Tort Liability Act” Article 65 “pollution of the environment ” concept to expand the scope of the article So that new types of pollution such as light pollution can also be remedied in accordance with the Article. The second is to deconstruct environmental pollution and propose to decompose the environmental pollution into two stages of polluting pollutants and pollutants. This is regarded as a continuation Sexual abuse, thus re-select the starting point of limitation of environmental pollution liability litigation.