论文部分内容阅读
这里所谈的实际上是一个形式逻辑的问题,也是一个老问题,但却值得再提。先谈概念的确定。 列宁在他的《黑格尔“哲学史讲演录”一书摘要》中说过,“人的概念并不是不动的,而是永恒运动的,相互转化的,往返流动的;否则,它们就不能反映活生生的生活。对概念的分析、研究,‘运用概念的艺术’(恩格斯),始终要求研究概念的运动、它们的联系、它们的相互转化。”(《列宁全集》第38卷第277页)追求概念的一律,搞标准化,未必利于学术的进步。例如:有的主张采用国际规范清理概念,主张搞专门委员来统一术语,(见《世界经济导报》1989年3月20日、《新华文摘》1989年第5期等)这不妨
What we are talking about here is actually a formal logic problem, but also an old one, but worth mentioning. First determine the concept. Lenin, in his lecture on the history of philosophy in Hegel's “History of Abstracts,” said: “The concepts of man are not immobile, but perpetual, interconverted, flowing back and forth; otherwise, they Can not reflect a living life.The analysis of concepts, research, the 'art of using concepts' (Engels) always call for the study of conceptual movements, their connections, and their mutual transformation. ”(Lenin, Collected Works, Vol 38, No. 277 Page) The pursuit of the concept of uniform, engage in standardization, may not be conducive to academic progress. For example, some people advocate the adoption of international norms to clean up concepts and advocate for special committees to unify terminology (see World Economic Herald, March 20, 1989, Xinhua Digest, 1989, No. 5, etc.)